Following up on the federal government’s election promise to provide a roadmap to double philanthropy by 2030, the Treasurer has given the Productivity Commission a reference to undertake an inquiry into philanthropy.

It is proposed to identify and assess opportunities and obstacles to increasing philanthropic giving and volunteering to provide a roadmap to achieving this objective.

The Commission is tasked with reviewing the success of other giving programs overseas and examining tax and other incentives for promoting giving.

Some of the more controversial areas will be its work on:

  • the effectiveness of, foundations in encouraging philanthropic giving and supporting the charitable sector;
    • perhaps it may include an examination of the establishment and management fees of Trustee companies and remuneration of trustees or related parties?
  • the potential to increase philanthropy by enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of donations;
    • perhaps it might also examine the cost of applying and reporting for grants from foundations?
  • the ability of donors to assess and compare charities based on evidence of effectiveness, including through impact evaluations and making comparisons across charities. In doing so, the Commission should consider the work of overseas impact evaluation comparison sites;
    • perhaps it will examine the shortfallings of such sites and the promotion of the so-called ‘starvation cycle’ where nonprofit applicants understate or under-invest in administrative expenses critical to their operation to make the metrics?
  • to assess the effectiveness and fairness of the deductible gift recipient framework and how it aligns with public policy objectives and the priorities of the broader community.
    • perhaps it will consider the present 52 categories of DGRs being overly complex and administratively cumbersome, and as the previous Productivity Commission pointed out, they should be reformed to cut government administration costs and boost giving (see below). The OCED in 2020, in a forty-country review of philanthropic tax incentives, drew attention to the need to reform DGR status.

The terms of reference specifically refer to the Productivity Commission’s previous 2010 inquiry, Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector, for ideas. Some of the unimplemented recommendations from that report include:

  1. the regulation of volunteers (such as police checks) is imposing a growing compliance burden and should be addressed on a national basis;
  2. current DGR arrangements are distortionary and out of date, and it was suggested that government progressively expand DGR status to all charitable institutions and funds that are endorsed;
  3. Australian governments should take the lead in the adoption of payroll giving; and
  4. building the capacity of NFPs to undertake evaluations and demonstrate impact will also assist in attracting public and business support.

Article by:

Latest News

April 18, 2024

A housing trust’s modernisation requires Court approval

Background The Baxter Homes Trust (Trust), was a charitable trust established in Victoria by a deed executed in 1960. Its purpose was to provide aged inhabitants of Geelong Victoria or its neighbourhood with housing as administered by The Geelong and Western District Ladies Benevolent Association’ incorporated under the Hospitals and Charities Act 1890. The Trust A housing trust’s modernisation requires Court approval

Read Article

April 18, 2024

Draft Regulations for NPO Self-Review Assessment Return Released

We have previously written in bulletins about the forthcoming self-assessment tax review for non-profit profit organisations which have an Australian Business Number (ABN) but are not registered as charities with the ACNC – Be alert to being alarmed on viewing your club or society annual report this year and self-assessment by tax-exempt. The background is Draft Regulations for NPO Self-Review Assessment Return Released

Read Article

March 13, 2024

Last of the loopholes? Let’s hope so!

Background All Australian employers will be acutely aware that the Federal government has, since the last election, embarked on a fairly aggressive program of targeted changes to the nation’s industrial relations laws. So far, we’ve had changes aimed at supporting Australia’s jobs and economic recovery[1], gained more respect at work[2], we’ve secured our jobs and Last of the loopholes? Let’s hope so!

Read Article